TO A HIGHER STANDARD?

I always taught that the international standard ISO 55000 was a milestone achievement for the profession of Asset Management when it was published in 2014. A consensus across many sectors and countries, when it’s clear not everyone sees the same things in AM.

It’s really about AM as a quality management system – do what you say, say what you do.

And it does acknowledge the issue of senior management, the decisions makers – the importance of leadership actively supporting the management system.

However, plenty of organisations have not felt a great need to be certified against it, even if it addresses basically sensible management practice.

I want to think about two aspects of this.

First, they don’t need certification because it’s not anything they feel especially held accountable for. A couple of bodies, such as Ofgem the UK power regulator, have considered making it a legal or licence requirement, but have been resisted.

Second, even if it were in some way enforced, it doesn’t address big decisions. Somehow, it doesn’t say anything about how an organisation, or a government, decides to spend millions on an infrastructure project – how to avoid wasting the money, or anything they should do after they have a failed project on their hands. It doesn’t really address budgeting at all.

It’s pitched at middle management processes. Yes, lower asset decisions need to be aligned with overall organisational goals – and in some way signed off by top management.

But about the decisions top management makes itself, not so much.

I am not asking for an amended standard in ISO terms. More something like higher standards in public service (and infrastructure is always a service to communities, even when controlled by commercial companies).

What should we do instead, in addition?

  • How to get the organisations themselves to think more carefully about their big, long term decisions – it that possible through internal audit-type mechanisms? (Such as, are they following their own asset strategies and long-term planning and budgeting processes?)
  • And how much do we, the public, need more formal mechanisms like third party audits, and tougher regulators, to hold them accountable for how they make the big money infrastructure decisions?

What can we, as Asset Management professionals, as middling managers, do about this?

One Thought on “TO A HIGHER STANDARD?

  1. Ashley Bishop on September 10, 2025 at 12:48 pm said:

    Perhaps the answer is eternal vigilance and the courage to speak out. It also stems from where the people who do Asset Management sit in the organisation, the further down the chain of commad from the CEO the less impact they will have.

    The public don’t often get the chance to question some big infrastructure projects as they are sold fait accompli and with all the positive political spin, we call that democracy, but is it?

    The business case, but even that can be manipulated and lets face it Governments don’t always do what they make others do and hide behind commercial in confidence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation