The 9th World Urban Forum was held in Kuala Lumpur a week ago. This is where tens of thousands of people from across the world gather to find ‘best practice’ examples and ideas that they can take back to their countries or organisations to improve their communities. Now, apart from being different from what is being done now, what commends a particular ‘best practice’ example to any individual participant? What should? What do you look for in a ‘best practice’ example? (e.g. what tells you that it IS ‘best practice’?) What would it take to develop a guidance tool to quickly assess any given example, to enable you to hone in on those with the most opportunity for success? Considering the dangers of ‘doing different’ just for difference sake, of which we spoke in the last post, I have, over the last few months, been speaking with a couple of colleagues as to how this could be done.
Where do we start? Firstly – Know thyself! Those of you who were caught up in the benchmarking craze some years ago, may remember how organisations would gleefully arrange meetings with ‘best practice’ organisations to see what they could glean. And they would do this, without first taking the trouble to understand fully what they were themselves doing. Many changes were made that lacked understanding, and caused more damage than they avoided.
A first iteration of such a guidance app, with a strong focus on understanding our own organisations and what is driving their decision making, was trialled at the Urban Forum in KL last week which established proof of concept.
We are now considering a forum for further development and testing.
Question:
Does this idea intrigue you? And would you would like to be part of its further development? If so, please let me know in the comments section below or write me at penny@TalkingInfrastructure.com
Next Week: Problems with Infrastructure Decision Making.
Community membership is open to everyone who has an interest in making the changes in infrastructure necessary for the 21st century, there is no fee – and we welcome you all!
However, for those community members who would like to go further and actively contribute to the goals of Talking Infrastructure, invitations are offered to become full (i.e. voting, direction-setting) members.
Please welcome our most recent Full Members:
Dr Neville Binning
Neville’s company, EDAB, has a speciality in transport infrastructure. He has a PhD in Asset Management and is the International Vice President of the Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport (CILT). Neville has taken on the role of Chair of the Talking Infrastructure’s Perth City Chapter.
Hein Aucamp,
Hein is Infrastructure Asset Management Consultant at WA Integrated Asset Management. Hein is a member of the Perth City Chapter and a contributer to the Blog. Multi-talented, Hein also has broadcasting experience in South Africa.
Sophie Wallis,
Sophie is an experienced facilitator and Strategy and Sustainability Consultant at Upthink, a member of the Perth City Chapter and contributor to the Blog. When we realised that we both had an interest in Nudge Theory and Behavioural Economics and its relationship to infrastructure, Sophie and I collaborated on a series of blogs on Nudge Theory.
Chris Adam,
Chris is Director of Strategic AM Pty Ltd, is a management consultant specialising in the water industry. Chris was a regular contributor to Strategic Asset Management and is one of the first to have made the essential transition now to Infrastructure Decision Making. He is a contributor to the Blog and a specialist advisor to Talking Infrastructure.
ACTION If you would like to be invited to become a full, voting, direction-setting, member of Talking Infrastructure, there are TWO simple steps you need to take:
Step One: Join the Talking Infrastructure Community as a Community Member
Step Two: Text me your mobile number so that we may organise a chat to find out what you are interested in and would like to see us do.
Penny Burns, Chair, Talking Infrastructure, 0434 406 751
No fees
The Board has decided that for the foreseeable future we will not charge fees for full voting membership of Talking Infrastructure. Full membership will, instead, be by invitation to those Community members that contribute in a meaningful way to the work of the Association.
Our first invitations go to
- Kerry McGovern, of K.McGovern & Associates, who initiated, and collaborated with Talking Infrastructure in designing, a 5 day workshop in the audit of infrastructure performance for Auditors-General in the Pacific Islands.
- Mark Neasbey, of the Australian Centre for Value Management, who has contributed many posts for the Blog, that have been amongst the most highly read and commented on.
- Ben Lawson of Common Thread Consulting who has been a regular reader and prolific commentator on the blog
Our congratulations to Kerry, Mark and Ben. Your commitment to the development, information exchange and debate ideals of Talking Infrastructure are putting us where we are today.
Thank you.
Recent Comments